The Reason Automakers Are Dropping Manual Transmissions
Sep 12, 2013 13:07
Why are so many automakers dropping manual transmissions from their lineups? It turns out, they it is the expensive software to blame. While the transmissions may be simple and cheap to manufacture, the integration cost is sky high.
Total recalibration is required for a new car's computer systems to accept a three pedal gearbox. According to an industry insider:
Well, I can offer you some insight from my experience fighting for this from the inside of an OEM.
To develop, test, homologate, and certify an MTX [manual transmission - Ed.] variant of a vehicle platform is very costly. Probably more costly than the borderline MTX enthusiast might be willing to pay. It's not just the hardware which can get costly for a well synthesized box - It's the software. Whether we like it or not, software drives modern day cars. Engine, Transmission, and ESP/ABS/TCS systems all run on software. Sure, the base software for the control systems can be carried over, but the calibration for these systems is not trivial by any means, and requires significant man-years of development and several prototype test properties in multiple environments to develop, test, and certify performance and safety.
I knew a seasoned vehicle calibrator in the company, and he showed me a graph with an exponential curve fit through several data points. The X-axis was vehicle model year. The Y-axis was the number of calibration set points required for _just_ the engine calibration. In the 1980's it was up to 10. By the late 1990's it was in the 10,000's and the trend was climbing steeply. This didn't even consider yet the ESP/ABS/TCS systems which have also grown in complexity over the past decade. Add several tens of thousands more calibration points for them.
Most of the auto manufacturers do a 'value added' calculation to assess vehicle program feasibility / profitability. Unfortunately, when you consider the cost of the per-vehicle parts and development/test/homologation/certification amortized over the volume of a low take-rate option like MTX, it doesn't paint a good picture.
I fought long and hard for enthusiast oriented content during my career there, only to find that it was difficult to (believe it or not) get some product planners to appreciate the importance of the enthusiast market since enthusiasts serve as taste makers for the main stream.
So, all of you MTX fan boys and girls out there, keep buying new cars with MTX's. That's the only way to ensure that product planners can justify this kind of content. When the take-rates fall below 5%, it becomes a tough sell.
After reading the concept of Car Subscription Service, one can conclude that it indeed is a novel idea. For consumers and the dealers alike. But mulling more on the topic leads to the inevitable question: Is there a future for Car Subscription in the general market? I mean, we all know that this service currently favors the rich majority, but is there a chance for this convenience to be available for the general public? And what scope does it hold for expansion? Read more
In the 21st century, it's possible to keep your car up and determine all about your car maintenance by using your mobile phone. It is beyond the expectations of how a cell phone will determine your car's fuel, or its consumption, etc. It's not easy to take care of your vehicle as it needs a lot of time and funds. Read more
Every vehicle proprietor likes their vehicles to be as engaging as conceivable as far as feel. There are various alternatives accessible. Yet, window tinting is the most appropriate primarily because it is spending plan well disposed. However, it needs just an economic aggregate of cash. Read more